rec.autos.makers.honda - 15 new messages in 4 topics - digest

rec.autos.makers.honda
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.autos.makers.honda?hl=en

rec.autos.makers.honda@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Advice on replacing 94-97 Accord muffler? Dealing with rubber hangers? - 1
messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.autos.makers.honda/t/6177abc0dc793c8f?hl=en
* 03' CRV: P0661....Intake Manifold Tuning Valve Control Circuit Low (Bank 1) -
2 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.autos.makers.honda/t/bdd0279bf9b4dbdc?hl=en
* 2000 3.5L Odyssey Cylinder Head Removal Help - 5 messages, 2 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.autos.makers.honda/t/b6e089c8b65a1b4b?hl=en
* new Honda CR-V break in - 7 messages, 5 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.autos.makers.honda/t/e22c4e2539b2b72e?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Advice on replacing 94-97 Accord muffler? Dealing with rubber hangers?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.autos.makers.honda/t/6177abc0dc793c8f?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Tues, Dec 29 2009 7:45 pm
From: cf005@FreeNet.Carleton.CA (M.A. Stewart)

AZ Nomad (aznomad.3@PremoveOBthisOX.COM) writes:
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 18:54:52 -0600, Grumpy AuContraire <GrumpyOne@GrumpyvilleNOT.com> wrote:
>>Tegger wrote:
>>> jim beam <me@privacy.net> wrote in
>>> news:r7KdnX_nYKKHRqrWnZ2dnUVZ_j5i4p2d@speakeasy.net:
>>>
>>>> On 12/27/2009 01:29 PM, Grumpy AuContraire wrote:
>>>
>>>>> In the 1970's, I was involved in a research/documentary project where
>>>>> one of the issues was the destruction of the tropical corral reefs by
>>>>> the Acanthaster planci. There are still some who are alarmed by its
>>>>> continued existence. A lot of resources were devoted to remedial action
>>>>> but in the end, it just turned out to be a cyclical event. After that
>>>>> experience, I vowed then never to be misled by bad science.
>>>> that story would be more believable [and thus more credible] if you
>>>> spelled it "coral", not corral.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> If a man who smokes tells you not to smoke because it's bad for your
>>> health, is his message invalid because he himself smokes? Ignore the
>>> (stupidly trivial) spelling mistake and pay attention to Grumpy's point