Happy Hump Day! March 10, 1985: Jimmy Hensley wins his first NASCAR race, the Nationwide Series Mountain Dew 400 at .363-mile Hickory (N.C.) Motor Speedway. Hensley takes the checkered flag in the 200-lap race 6 seconds ahead of Jack Ingram. Larry Pearson finishes third. Picture yourself cruising in Tony's 2010 Camaro Coupe 2SS. It's a "Summit White", list price at over $35,000! Tony asked Will Castro of Unique Autosports to work his magic and add a few customizations! Buy a ticket for $50 – you'll be entered to win the Grand Prize including the Camaro, A VIP Trip to Stewart-Haas Racing and a personal meet & greet with Tony!!! 70 Early Bird prizes starting March 15th. Get 'em while you can!!!! Just go to www.smokescamaro. Bits and Pieces Edwards: I respect NASCAR's penalty Greg Engle/NASCAR Examiner Carl Edwards said late Tuesday night that he's ready to move on. Two Crew Members Suspended for Violating Substance Abuse Policy: Matthew Huffstetler, a crew member for the #01 team in the NASCAR Camping World Truck Series, and William Keith, a crew member for the #38 team in the NASCAR Sprint Cup Series, have been indefinitely suspended from NASCAR for violating the sanctioning body's substance abuse policy. On March 5, both were found to have violated Sections 12-1 (actions detrimental to stock car racing) and 19 (violation of the NASCAR substance abuse policy) of the 2010 NASCAR rule book.(NASCAR PR) UPDATE: NASCAR has suspended two crewmen for violating its substance abuse policy, including the former brother-in-law of Jeremy Mayfield. William David Keith, a spotter for David Gilliland in the Sprint Cup Series, is one of the two crewmen and was suspended Tuesday. Keith gave a deposition in Mayfield's legal battle with NASCAR, claiming he witnessed Mayfield using methamphetamines several times. Mayfield became the first driver last May to be suspended under NASCAR's toughened drug policy.(Associated Press/ESPN.com) Humphrey Named ISC Managing Director of Business Operations: International Speedway Corporation announced it has named Rick Humphrey as Managing Director of Business Operations. Humphrey accepts the role from his most recent position as president of Talladega Superspeedway. W. Grant Lynch Jr., Chairman of Talladega Superspeedway and Vice President of Strategic Projects for ISC, will assume the responsibilities for day to day operation of the facility. Humphrey, 41, is a 16-year veteran in the motorsports industry, serving most recently as president of Talladega Superspeedway since July 2007. As president, he worked closely with the facility's more than 50 employees to secure, maintain and operate the 2.66-mile, 3,000-plus acre complex, and presided over a significant number of upgrades and enhancements to the legendary race track. In his new role, Humphrey will be primarily responsible for driving operational excellence across all ISC racetracks through benchmarking, innovation and best practice sharing. In addition, he will provide leadership for ISC's Green initiatives. (Talladega PR) NASCAR cutting Developmental Division Season-Ending Payouts: With economy woes continuing to hit motorsports hard, in January it was learned that NASCAR would be cutting purses in 2010 by about 10 percent for its three national divisions, the Sprint Cup Series, the Nationwide Series and the Camping World Truck Series. And NASCAR's developmental touring divisions, which include the & Whelen Modified Tour and K&N Pro Series East, won't be immune to the measures, though cuts will come in a different form. NASCAR has decided to cut by 25 percent the amount of teams that will get paid in each division's end of the season points fund, which is the money paid out to teams based on their standings finish. Teams on the Whelen Modified Tour received notification last week that the top-15 teams in 2010 will receive points fund money, down from the top-20 in 2009. Payouts for the top-15 teams this season in the divisions affected are expected to remain the same as last year.(Hartford Courant) Jack Roush to be Honored with Robert E. Petersen Lifetime Achievement Award: On Friday, March 12 Jack Roush will receive the highest compliment in the hot rod world as he will be presented with the Robert E. Petersen Lifetime Achievement Award. The ceremony takes place during the grand opening breakfast of the 12th Annual HotRod & Restoration Trade Show in front of nearly one thousand attendees at the Indiana Convention Center in Indianapolis. "Being named a recipient of the Robert E. Petersen Lifetime Achievement Award is obviously a tremendous distinction and something completely unexpected," Roush said. "I remember Robert (Petersen) always being a great ambassador for the auto industry and hot rods. It is an honor to be mentioned among the many legendary names who have received this award in the past." The Robert E. Petersen Lifetime Achievement Award has been presented annually since 2002. Previous recipients include Wally Parks (NHRA), Carroll Shelby, George Barris, Vic Edelbrock, the Ford family, Alex Xydias (So-Cal Speed Shop), and "Speedy" Bill Smith (Speedway Motors).(Roush Fenway) Truex's Pit Crew Wins Again; Captures Tissot Award in Atlanta: The over-the-wall crew for Martin Truex Jr. claimed another victory, earning the Tissot Pit Road Precision Award in Sunday's Kobalt Tools 400 race at Atlanta Motor Speedway. The #56 crew's performance places the team in first place in the Tissot standings with back-to-back wins (Las Vegas, Atlanta) after four races in the 2010 season. Truex's NAPA Auto Parts Toyota, out of the Michael Waltrip Racing stable, spent the least amount of time on pit road - 349.623 seconds - during the overtime race, which was extended from 325 laps to 341. Race winner Kurt Busch's #2 Dodge was second (352.887) and Paul Menard's #98 Ford was third (353.488).(Tissot/ NASCAR Did The Right Thing By Not Suspending Edwards Greg Engle/NASCAR Examiner NASCAR president Mike Helton announced Tuesday that Carl Edwards would receive no serious penalties from Sunday's incident with Brad Keselowski at Atlanta Motor Speedway. NASCAR delivers the wrong message Terry Blount/espn. When NASCAR told drivers "have at it," they meant it. Vigilante justice has prevailed. Carl Edwards has received a three-race probation for deliberately wrecking Brad Keselowski on Sunday at Atlanta, sending Keselowski's car upside down and airborne into the wall and catch fencing. To call this penalty a slap on the wrist would be an insult to the pain of wrist slapping. This is no penalty whatsoever. Carl got away with it, and the message to the other drivers in the garage is "So can you." NASCAR just gave drivers the green light to go for it under almost any circumstance. Welcome to the Wild West, boys. Yeehah! NASCAR president Mike Helton made the announcement Tuesday. Some people, including me, wanted to see NASCAR issue a one-race suspension to Edwards, knowing that was unlikely. However, a major points penalty seemed logical for a retaliatory move by Edwards that could have seriously injured or killed a driver and spectators. The NASCAR hierarchy felt differently. "We reached the conclusion that Carl would receive probation for the next three races," Helton said. "I think Carl is aware of what that means." Yes, he is. It means nothing. It means he can do whatever he wants without fear of consequence. It means that a premeditated act of driver rage on a dangerous high-speed oval isn't so bad after all. Helton pointed out that NASCAR acted immediately and parked Edwards when the incident happened: "We did not allow him to continue the event." Yes, how painful that must have been for a driver over 100 laps down at the end of the race. Edwards knew that was coming. He couldn't have cared less, as he showed by defiantly driving in the wrong direction down pit road. A quick side note: My frustration has nothing to do with Edwards personally, a very likable guy who has been good for the sport. I would feel the same way if this was Jimmie Johnson or Jeff Burton or Dale Earnhardt Jr. It's the act of intentionally endangering others at 190 mph that is worthy of condemnation, regardless of who administered it. For the record, Keselowski took the high road Tuesday. "I support NASCAR in the decision they communicated today," Keselowski said in a press release. "They are not in an enviable position when it comes to these matters, but they do an outstanding job. "The unfortunate part about what happened on Sunday is that it has overshadowed a win by the No. 2 Miller Lite Dodge [Kurt Busch, Keselowski's teammate] and an overall solid performance by Penske Racing at Atlanta. Hopefully we can move past this and get ready for Bristol." Keselowski has no intention of enflaming the issue at this point, a smart move on his part. Some people have suggested that no one would have cared if Keselowski's car had harmlessly skidded down the asphalt and not hit a thing. So let's take the opposite extreme. How would you feel had Keselowski been seriously injured or killed? How would you feel if this payback moment had seriously injured or killed a fan? The fact that Keselowski's car became airborne in a horrifying crash should be a warning of what can happen when drivers are allowed to take matters into their own hands at a track as dangerous as Atlanta. Helton pointed out that the biggest issue was Keselowski's car getting airborne. "That was a very serious issue," Helton said. "It's something we will take a look at quickly to figure out how to prevent that from happening." Well, for starters, a meaningful penalty for deliberately wrecking a driver at almost 200 mph might help. Cars getting airborne in an accident are one of the reasons NASCAR is eliminating the rear wing and going back to the rear spoiler. That will help, but I have some news for you. Cars were getting airborne in crashes long before this wing was put on the rear deck lid. Talking about how severe the accident was completely misses the point. The issue is whether one driver can wreck another driver under any conditions. Whatever you think of Brad Keselowski, no driver deserves to be placed in harm's way of tragedy strictly because a rival wants to send him a message in a moment of rage. NASCAR's new policy of looser rules enforcement is fine when we're talking about guys bumping and banging while racing for position. I didn't think it meant an uncontrolled- "We made it very clear to [Edwards] that these actions were not acceptable," Helton said. You did? That's like saying your mother made it clear to you not to take another cookie from the cookie jar by telling you to eat cake instead. Helton said NASCAR officials met with Roger Penske, Keselowski's team owner, and Jack Roush, Edwards' boss. "There has been an evolution in the [bad] relationship between these two drivers," Helton said. "Roger's biggest concern was that this was said and done and over with." It probably is over with between Edwards and Keselowski. But NASCAR's leniency here means other drivers may think it's OK to crash each other anywhere at any time. "Ultimately, drivers understand the seriousness of this topic," Helton said. Why would they understand the seriousness of it when NASCAR's reaction is mild at best? "There is a line you can cross," Helton said. "We'll step in to maintain law and order when we think the line is crossed." Where is that line? "We see it when we see it," Helton said. They didn't see it Sunday. Based on the verdict Tuesday, no line was crossed when Edwards came back on the track over 100 laps down with the intent of wrecking a man heading for a top-5 finish. "What we talked about is backing away from the grip we have on drivers," Helton said. The grip? No one is even holding the rope. Have at it, boys. The free-for-all is on. And where that leads may be a place no one wants to go. Carl Edwards May Have Escaped NASCAR's Court, but the Real Jury Still Awaits Kelly Crandall/bleacherre There's an old saying about first impressions: you only get to make it once. When Carl Edwards entered the Sprint Cup Series back in 2005, he was a driver that every fan could root for: down to earth, worked his way up from the local tracks, and didn't have a reputation that proceeded him. But after Sunday's incident in the Kobalt Tools 500, the fans' impressions of Edwards may have changed. Everyone knows what happened, everyone knows why it happened, and everyone knows what has been said about it. After it happened though, everyone wanted to know what was next. Many felt that Edwards has abused NASCAR's new "have at it, boys" policy. Some said that Brad Keselowski got what he deserved and that it was no harm, no foul. There were those, including many drivers' wives/girlfriends that reached out via Twitter, that were appalled. The general sentiment, besides saying they lost respect for him, was that his true colors were showing and that he wasn't the nice guy that TV always portrayed him to be. Something had to be done and a suspension and heavy fine was in order. Today, NASCAR did neither, instead handing down to Edwards a three race probation that spans through all three of NASCAR's top series: Camping World Truck, Nationwide, and Sprint Cup Series. Once the decision was announced, some drivers then took to Twitter to let their followers know their reactions, some agreed, some didn't. The best reaction though, came from Kevin Harvick who said he wanted to ask NASCAR for a refund of all his past penalties, including when he was suspended from a Cup race after an incident he had in the Truck Series. Edwards' probation will start when the action resumes in two weeks at Bristol Motor Speedway. It's not a more fitting track for Edwards' real punishment to be announced. Most are certain that Edwards escaped easy today. NASCAR slapped him on the wrist and he'll continue on his merry way. When Edwards arrives in Bristol, it won't be very merry for very long and the reason is quite simple: the fans. NASCAR has officially spoken and now the fans get their chance. That's for those that haven't already decided on Edwards' fate, and some have, thanks to popular social networking sites such as aforementioned Twitter and Facebook. In fact, the fans on Facebook have already announced just how they feel about the Missouri native by creating a group called "Carl Edwards is an A**." But there are those that still don't know what to think or how to feel. They might still be in shock of what they witnessed on Sunday and thanks to this week being an off weekend for NASCAR competition, they'll have two weeks to make up their minds. And if the fans that are attending the race in Bristol react in the same way they did to Kurt Busch back in 2003, it won't be pretty. Busch arrived in Bristol after being involved in a post-race altercation with Jimmy Spencer the week before at Michigan. It's said that after the two made contact on the racetrack, Spencer went up to Busch in the garage and punched him. Spencer was suspended for the race at Bristol and the fans didn't like it. For the Saturday night event, they made signs that surrounded the bullring type track that expressed how they felt about Busch and some even declared "Free Jimmy." The message the fans were sending was simple: NASCAR may have the official say, but NASCAR fans get the most important one. They are the true jury and the ones that drivers really have to answer to. Ken Squire said it best: "It was Kurt Busch who had to face the decision of the true jury. For a week, NASCAR fans around the country deliberated and their verdict was announced loud and clear in the courtroom of the Bristol Motor Speedway." The verdict? Busch was booed... loudly... and a lot. Now, NASCAR fans find themselves in the same situation heading to the same track. They have two weeks to deliberate on how they feel about Edwards and how they'll view him from here on out. Will they welcome Edwards with open arms? Will they see a different man TV portrays and shower him with boos? Or will they be so worn out of all the coverage and controversy they just won't care anymore? The good news for Edwards is that if he follows in the footsteps of Busch from his 2003 Bristol experience, he'll end the weekend in victory lane. That's if he can keep his nose clean and not find himself in anymore unwanted altercations. Facing NASCAR may have been easy, but now Edwards must face those that aren't always so forgiving and don't always forget. NASCAR set precedent, now they have to deal with it Darrell Waltrip/foxsports. In case you haven't heard yet, NASCAR announced that they will not suspend Carl Edwards after intentionally wrecking Brad Keselowski at Atlanta Motor Speedway this past weekend. It's like I've been saying folks, I just don't see how you can begin the season saying, "We are going to let the drivers be drivers, go out there and have at it boys" and then the first time something controversial comes up suspend a guy, slap a fine on him or whatever. We'd all love for Edwards and Keselowski to go to Bristol and qualify side by side and carry a little bit of this on at a short track, but who knows if it will or not. Retro Racing Mark Aumann Making the Chase a matter of simple formula to follow By Mark Aumann, NASCAR.COM Want to guarantee yourself a spot in the Chase for Sprint Cup? It's as easy as 1-2-3 -- as in averaging 123 points per race. Dustin Long of Landmark Newspapers wrote an interesting piece earlier this season where crew chief Brian Pattie suggested that an average finish of 14th was good enough to make the Chase. Not including bonuses for leading laps, that would work out to 121 points per race, or a total of 3,146 points. That caused me to pull out the record books and do some calculating of my own. Pattie's figure would have been good enough for every season under the Chase format except for 2009, when both Kyle Busch (3,195) and Matt Kenseth (3,165) exceeded that figure and still missed the Chase field. Averaging 123 points for a 26-race schedule would result in a total of 3,198. And since NASCAR went to the Chase format in its premier series following the 2003 season, no driver who has amassed at least 3,200 points after 26 races has failed to be among the top 12 in the standings after Richmond. That includes Tony Stewart, who missed the 2006 Chase despite accumulating 3,303 points in 26 races, before the Chase field was expanded to 12 drivers. After four races, drivers attempting to stay above the "123 line" would need to have at least 492 points after Atlanta, and 10 drivers currently meet that requirement. Compare that to the 13 drivers who were ahead of the average after Las Vegas, including Joey Logano, Carl Edwards, Busch and Jeff Gordon. On the other hand, with his fifth-place run at Atlanta, Paul Menard moved himself above the 123 line for the time being. After four races, Scott Speed and Gordon are 10 points shy of the magic number, while Dale Earnhardt Jr. (-17), Logano (-21), Busch (-24) and Brian Vickers (-26) are next closest. With finishes of ninth and fourth in his past two starts, Kasey Kahne's now averaging 111.75 points per race. However, Jamie McMurray (34th and 29th in the same races) and Edwards (12th and 39th) are going the wrong way. That's not to say that a total of less than 3,200 points won't be good enough for a place in the Chase. In fact, Busch and Kenseth have proven to be the exception rather than the rule. In 2008, the cutoff was 3,047 points -- with Kenseth and Clint Bowyer making the Chase field with point totals less than 3,200. In 2007, Earnhardt's 13th-place total of 2,954 was easily exceeded by Bowyer (3,179), Kurt Busch and Martin Truex Jr. (3,160), and Kevin Harvick (3,155). You have to go back to the first season under the Chase format -- 2004 -- to find drivers with at least 3,100 points who missed the postseason. Even using the current 12-driver format, Bobby Labonte (3,137), Harvick (3,129) and Dale Jarrett (3,100) would have found themselves on the outside looking in. Interestingly enough, the trend of season-long points racing seems to be the primary cause for steadily increasing totals. In the past four seasons before the Chase format was instituted, no driver 13th or better in the standings had as many as 3,000 points after 26 races. By 2005, it would have taken 2,972 points to make a 12-driver Chase field. A year later, that figure was up to 3,039. And after two seasons where the range was in the 3,100s, Vickers needed nearly all of his 3,203 points to grab the 12th and final spot in the 2009 Chase. Will averaging 123 points a race be good enough to make the Chase in 2010? We'll know for sure after Richmond. Did You Notice? Thomas Bowles · Frontstretch. Edwards "Probation" Green Lights Driver Aggression, Gibbs Falls Behind, And NASCAR's Dangerous CoT Did You Notice? … That while the fans are broken up about Carl Edwards' penalty (or lack thereof), the drivers really aren't all that upset. Take a look at this cross-section of Tweets about the incident: Brian Vickers: I bet the 12 will think twice about wrecking anyone again! I bring this up because it tells us a couple of things about the state of the sport… 1) Brad Keselowski doesn't have many friends that drive a race car. I say that because there are no long lines of tweets expressing utter frustration Edwards wasn't suspended for one race or more. In fact, I have yet to see more than maybe one or two people outside the Penske Racing family who's an active driver openly stick up for Brad (sorry Kyle Petty, you don't count). Does Brad care about being the loner? We don't know yet, but it's an interesting question to ponder. I've always felt the most successful people beat to the beat of their own drummer, and one of the reasons I do appreciate Brad the person is how he's up front and honest, that what you see is what you get without beating around the bush. Ironically, just like Carl he's not driving in the Cup Series to make friends; he's here to win races. Still… it's got to be notable for him that the rest of the NASCAR driving community saw him flip and pretty much came back with the attitude, "Well man, you deserved it." That's the type of reality check that makes or breaks a driver's career … and after falling to 33rd in the points, you wonder if a change in style (or a Dale Carnegie book on making friends) will be in order over at the No. 12 shop. 2) Drivers understand the risk that's involved with their sport. Like it or not, the ugly truth is Carl's bump could have killed Keselowski. It's an awful thing to say; but guess what? Any other ill-timed accident, a blown engine at the wrong place, about 1,000 different things could have given those drivers a real chance at serious injury as well Sunday. That's because racing at its core revolves around risk. If the drivers all ran around in circles at five miles an hour, would we watch? Don't get me wrong; we don't watch for the wrecks. But we watch knowing these men are putting their lives on the line to do something extraordinary we're not capable of doing. I think with the points racing and single-file parades we've often seen in recent years, people thought that these drivers lost that sense of aggression, that understanding of how risk plays into the sport. But if they didn't … they'd all be calling for Carl Edwards' head right now. So I think it's an amazing, healthy response in this sport for drivers to universally be in support for a punishment that was so much lighter than what anyone expected, I think my jaw was permanently open for about the first 5 minutes after the penalty was announced. In fact, I wish you could have tape-recorded my first five conversations after this whole announcement went down – the shock put me into a tailspin where I sounded like a drunken stoner on the phone for 15 minutes. Alright, I digress. Let's get back on point … 3) Drivers are ready and willing to get the green light for payback … and they have it. As Dale Jr. has said recently about NASCAR's rule changes, he feels like there's no one looking over his shoulder. After the penalty that was just announced – three weeks of probation for flipping another driver – I don't think anyone's going to feel Big Brother's even within 100 feet of them. And that means Bristol could be one of the most exciting races in recent years. Bad blood still brewing between Montoya and McMurray? We could see it spill out on that crazy half-mile. Does Denny want to get a little more payback on Brad? Well both of those cars have bumpers, don't they? I'd expect them to get used sometime next week or the following Sunday at Martinsville… Yeah, I understand there's a limit to the lunacy. These guys will still have sponsorship and championship obligations which will keep them from taking the ultimate risk every time out. But when they get mad, there's now one less thing bouncing around in their heads that's making them hold back from retaliation … and for fans desperate to see a little more action and a little less points racing, that can be nothing but a good thing. 4) NASCAR ignored the tide of public opinion. I have hundreds upon hundreds of emails from you fans (and appreciate every single one). My unofficial count is 70 percent pro-suspension, 30 percent anti-suspension. So there were a lot of surprised people today … but for those worried about safety, you have to understand that NASCAR racing is inherently unsafe. Anything could happen at any time, and see rule #2 … drivers accept that. They really, really do. With that said, those of you still looking for the sport to put the hammer down have yourselves a ray of hope. I was talking to a car owner today, and he said if there's so much as a minor injury under this new system, the threat of liability and big money sponsorships will force the sport to go back in another direction. God forbid anyone ever hopes for someone to get hurt; but if you're really put off by Edwards getting away scot free, know that over the long-term this policy isn't quite set in stone yet. Don't believe me? Just listen to Mike Helton on the teleconference today: "Historically, if you look back at NASCAR's reaction to things, we may react to the first incident differently than we react to the third or fourth or fifth incident." A-Ha! I knew the inconsistency would pop up at some point! You can teach an old dog new tricks, but you can't expect him to forget the old ones right away! Did You Notice? … That this year's label of Most Disappointing goes to Joe Gibbs Racing? Right now, none of their three cars are inside the top 12, and while Joey Logano's had a solid start Denny Hamlin and Kyle Busch have had more slipups than Ocho Cinco in one minute of rehearsal for Dancing With The Stars. But while Ocho-what's his name can slip in the privacy of his own home, Gibbs' public slipups have everyone scratching their heads and waiting for him to call a coaching timeout to fix the mess. What's going wrong? The answer, my friends, may be as simple as cold, hard cash. Gibbs has more of that in the Nationwide Series than anyone else, one reason why their Toyotas dominate head and shoulders above the rest of the field pretty much about every week. But one area in which they continue to struggle is Cup partnerships with other programs. Check out some of the top teams above them: Hendrick: Partnership with Stewart-Haas Racing, supplying chassis for six cars Let's compare that to the meager three cars of Gibbs, whose smaller operation puts them at a disadvantage. Like building their own motors opposed to the other Toyota programs; I guess that's a blessing in disguise this year considering how many TRD engines have failed, but at the same time the independence can also lead to isolation if those horsepower numbers are down. Meanwhile, as teams like Childress, Roush, and even Michael Waltrip Racing pick up investors, Gibbs has their family money and … well … that's about it. When's another financial backer going to step up and add a monetary boost to what's only a three-car team? I'm not saying money's the only problem here; clearly, bad luck, immaturity, and an inability to stay consistent during an entire race has played a factor amongst their driving trio. But you wonder if with all the chassis and engine cooperation amongst all these other programs, suddenly Gibbs might be turning into a bit more of an underdog than we thought. Did You Notice? … That in the midst of all this talk about the Keselowski – Edwards wreck and its implications, very few if any people are talking about the Car of Tomorrow itself? If Keselowski doesn't flip, it's doubtful that incident becomes a national story – and the car didn't go up in the air just because Edwards hit its back bumper. No, my friends … that car flew as directed 'cause there's a wing attached to its rear. With that said, let's stop and review. We've now seen cars fly up in the air at Talladega (restrictor plates, Ryan Newman), Dover (short track, Joey Logano), and Atlanta (intermediates, Brad Keselowski). And this car is supposed to be safer … how? Still waiting for your answer … still waiting … The bottom line is while NASCAR will never admit this mistake, the handling and the safety record of this car show it's been a disaster from the start. After 16 years since the introduction of the roof flap, you'd think safety would have improved to the point we'd be seeing cars flip into the air only in near-impossible scenarios. I understand we're going a little bit faster these days … but not that much faster. How these engineers could have designed this car and not thought of the upward aerodynamic ramifications of the wing is beyond me. There's just one thing I know for sure … we need to get it off as soon as possible. OK, time to go mourn my UConn Huskies' self-destruction this week. Talk about teams going in two opposite directions … the men drop out of the NCAAs while the women set an NCAA record for consecutive wins.
Well, that's all for today. Until the next time, I remain, Your Nascar Momma Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, wine in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"
"Don't come here and grumble about going too fast. Get the hell out of the race car if you've got feathers on your legs or butt. Put a kerosene rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up there and eat that candy ass." -Dale Earnhardt - 1998 |
knowyournascar-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To post message, send an email to:
knowyournascar@yahoogroups.com
-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
To post message, send an email to:
knowyournascar@yahoogroups.com
No comments:
Post a Comment