Sunday, January 23, 2011

alt.autos - 2 new messages in 2 topics - digest

alt.autos
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos?hl=en

alt.autos@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Depreciation - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos/t/42605948e926b649?hl=en
* Irwell is correct. Manual transmissions are best. - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos/t/9e13ce7644212876?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Depreciation
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos/t/42605948e926b649?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Jan 21 2011 1:44 pm
From: "Rod Speed"


BIGtitties wrote:

> I doubt I'll own my 2010 Accent 4-door long
> enough to determine longevity/depreciation.

Your problem.

> I bought a new 2010 Accent two months ago, but, being old-school, didn't
> think to look for or ask about a TEMPERATURE GAUGE at time of purchase.

> And the salesman didn't tell me about this missing instrument,
> either. Since that day he's been hard to contact.

> Intentional?

Unlikely given that few modern cars have them.

> I'll probably never know.

> But the absence of an in-dash analog gauge has made me uncomfortable,

Then fit an after market analog temperature guage. Not a shred of rocket science whatever required.

> and skeptical. Like what ELSE DOESN'T this motor vehicle have?

It doesnt have a buggy whip, or reins, or helmets for the occupants either.

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Irwell is correct. Manual transmissions are best.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos/t/9e13ce7644212876?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sat, Jan 22 2011 12:00 pm
From: "hls"

"Bjorn" <gosinn@gmail.com> wrote in message news:e32d5c90-464e-
http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/fordon_motor/bilar/article3067585.ece
http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20080707/154383/

That is no answer to my challenge. These are not in public use, as
I stipulated in my post.

AFAIK there is still no system that I know of that meets your claims:
" This is actually something that is tested and implemented.
It is a cheap and reliable way to set up a driverless public
transport."

It may be in tests but it is not publicly implemented.

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.autos"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.autos+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en

No comments:

Post a Comment