http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos.nissan?hl=en
alt.autos.nissan@googlegroups.com
Today's topics:
* 2011 NISMO Nissan GT-R Racing Competition - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos.nissan/t/977eddb91e427a24?hl=en
* Irwell is correct. Manual transmissions are best. - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos.nissan/t/9e13ce7644212876?hl=en
* 91 Nissan Sentra 1.6 4speed manual question about timing- - 1 messages, 1
author
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos.nissan/t/dead845dbec56614?hl=en
==============================================================================
TOPIC: 2011 NISMO Nissan GT-R Racing Competition
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos.nissan/t/977eddb91e427a24?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Sun, Jan 23 2011 11:13 pm
From: sjmmail2000-247@yahoo.co.uk
NISMO, Nissan's performance division, unveiled the NISMO GT-R Racing Competition at the Tokyo Auto Salon. The 2011 Nissan GT-R RC (Racing Competition) has been stripped to make it lighter and fitted with a stiffer suspension system, lightweight components, a welded roll cage, air jacks and an ATL 120-liter safety fuel tank. The NISMO GT-R RC [...]
Read More: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/revmodscom/~3/Wqbkegtpjno/
-----------------------------------
Nissan NewsHub: Latest auto news sourced from websites, portals and blogs
http://www.carshops247.co.uk/news/Nissan.html
==============================================================================
TOPIC: Irwell is correct. Manual transmissions are best.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos.nissan/t/9e13ce7644212876?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 4:25 am
From: Bjorn
On 22 Jan, 20:00, "hls" <h...@nospam.nix> wrote:
> "Bjorn" <gos...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:e32d5c90-464e-
>
> http://www.nyteknik.se/nyheter/fordon_motor/bilar/article3067585.ecehttp://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20080707/154383/
>
> That is no answer to my challenge. These are not in public use, as
> I stipulated in my post.
>
> AFAIK there is still no system that I know of that meets your claims:
> " This is actually something that is tested and implemented.
> It is a cheap and reliable way to set up a driverless public
> transport."
>
> It may be in tests but it is not publicly implemented.
Everything about electrical vehicles and new way of utilizing new
technology is very small at the moment.
The realization that the price of oil is going up and up is creating
interest and necessity for alternative solutions.
We have been sleeping on the guard for too long so the alternatives
have only recently become a real solution.
It may/will take quite some time and most probably years to get things
started.
The sooner the prices of oil go up the sooner the alternatives come.
In Europe the trains have been increasingly popular the last 20 to 30
years and public transport in general has gotten better.
The next step is being tested in various places and in many cases it
is a combination of ordinary trains combined with other kind of
transport.
Interestingly the waterways have been making a comback as well because
they are very economical where they are possible.
Making driverless vehicles and letting them do transport has been
around for decades but usually not often mixed with other kind of
traffic because other kind of traffic is often used by incompetent
drivers.
Using technology from trains and having lines above vehicles is being
tested and works well.
Using lines above the vehicles can be set up much more quickly than
setting out train tracks so that is a real alternative already with or
without a driver involved just to replace dependency on oil.
The reason for why Europe has began this road to get off oil so long
ago is partly because they had the good fortune to tax oil and thus
pointed ordinary people in the right direction.
Because the general trend to go electric is so recent it will
unfortunately take quite a long time to make any real impact.
The big producers of vehicles have also muddied the water by insisting
on continuing using oil by producing hybrids and calling them
electrics.
By setting out lines above the roads it would be easy to get the
trucks going on the roads like trains and it would get us faster off
oil.
==============================================================================
TOPIC: 91 Nissan Sentra 1.6 4speed manual question about timing-
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos.nissan/t/dead845dbec56614?hl=en
==============================================================================
== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Mon, Jan 24 2011 1:17 pm
From: nucleus
is your scanning tool sophisticated enough to tell you the
condition of your spark plugs and plug wires during sudden
acceleration?
if not, have you tried NEW spark plugs? theory is that increased
combustion chamber pressures during sudden opening of the
butterfly, can cause marginal plugs to misfire.
have the plug wires ever been replaced in all those miles (heat
soak cycles)?
On Jan 23, 5:40 pm, robbie <robbie.h.wil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 21, 4:18 pm, nucleus <rose122...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > haynes manual for GA16DE engine (includes '91) states ignition
> > timing should be 10 degrees BTDC (US) for manual transmission
> > with idle set at 650 rpm.
>
> > it is normal for spark timing to advance as engine speed increases,
> > i do not have info as to amount of advance at specific rpms.
>
> > On Jan 19, 4:38 pm, robbie <robbie.h.wil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > I purchased a Consult unit and am running ConZult free software on my
> > > laptop to get the following numbers:
> > > at idle, the timing is 11-12 degrees and when you increase idle up to
> > > about 2500 and back the reading goes up to 40-44 degrees the returns
> > > to 11-12. i'm really thinking this isn't normal and since I have
> > > already replaced the distributor I'm thinking i have a worn timing
> > > chain which allows such a great fluctuation. does anyone else agree
> > > before I start tearing into the valve cover to see what the top end
> > > looks like? the engine has 224k miles, so it is something to think
> > > about. Would this be able to cause drivability issues that i have been
> > > battling? hesitation/bucking on acceleration, lack of power at low
> > > end? Thanks to all who have time to reply. This is my first foray
> > > into diagnostic equipment, and those readings looked weird to me! If i
> > > am way off then someone school me quickly- i am trying to learn!
> > > -robbie
>
> Well at least one user thinks that this is the case and there's not
> much play in my timing chain. It seems to have decent power when the
> speed and rpms are up but its the acceleration during daily stop and
> go driving where the stumbling occurs. it really feels fuel starved,
> but that end has been checked. I am wondering if the coil could be
> weak since i don't have an accurate multimeter to test it's ohms
> reading while hot versus cold... i have never really been stuck on
> reapiring these minor problems before but this stumbling has me
> STUMPED. Anyone care to chime in again? I really have tested for a lot
> of different issues and have ruled out things like: temp sensor/o2
> sensor/EGR valve/vacuum leaks/etc but have made no progress. I have 2
> different distributors that also have been checked out and unless they
> both have bad sensor/control units in them then that item is ruled out
> as well.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
==============================================================================
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "alt.autos.nissan"
group.
To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos.nissan?hl=en
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to alt.autos.nissan+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.autos.nissan/subscribe?hl=en
To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com
==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/?hl=en
No comments:
Post a Comment